Celebrities are regarded as cultural, social or political figures open to comment or opinion; just ask Tiger Woods, whose licensing agent, ETW Corporation, lost its right of publicity claim against Jireh Publishing, who sold a poster with three images picturing Woods becoming the youngest golfer to win the U. Junior Amateur Championship—a use deemed fair in that case, and therefore not infringing on Woods' publicity rights.
Violation of Privacy and Wrongful Appropriation While we may not all enjoy strong rights of publicity like celebrities do, everyday people do enjoy an enhanced expectation of privacy over celebrities.
The five women in Missouri asserted violation of their privacy against the surgeon for the publication, and also for exposing them to unreasonable publicity (different from a “right of publicity” claim).
The basis of a privacy claim is that a person holds certain vital rights regarding his or her private life—any situation in which the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy (since celebrities expose themselves to higher public scrutiny, then, these rights are significantly diminished).
Copyright When Scarlett Johansson was victimized by a hacker who stole her nude pictures (taken herself) directly from her cell phone, her attorneys wasted no time: they registered the photos with the U. Copyright Office and declared Johansson the “copyright owner” of the photos.
Next, the attorneys sent out takedown notices to Internet Service Providers (ISPs) and websites, alleging copyright infringement due to unauthorized publication.
She was the one to snap the photographs of herself, and was therefore, clearly the copyright owner of the photos—so she utilized this right to effect takedown of the photos.
In the case of everyday folk, if faced with this scenario, a claim for violation of privacy could be asserted in addition to copyright infringement.
A run-of-the-mill case from Missouri shows a straightforward instance of allegations claiming the violation of this right.
In that case, a cosmetic surgeon publicized pictures of her patients' breasts on her website to promote her services.
In these instances, it doesn't matter who snapped the photo or who owns the copyright: without your consent, your rights to privacy have been violated.
In today's world of instantaneous photo posts, computer hackers, and rapidly growing Internet search tools, it may seem like privacy is altogether lost, but the law still provides several ways people can control the publication and distribution of their own images. Last wills and living trusts can accomplish similar objectives.
In addition to certain guarantees provided by law, Legal Zoom guarantees your satisfaction with our services and support.