If we learn through practice that sexual partners are “things” that exist for our satisfaction (however unpleasant the act of satisfying is…), there is no reason why that general mindset wouldn’t be transferred to human partners.Which leads to the most obvious objection to these AI love dolls: if we embrace a world in which sex with these (almost always) cartoonishly female AI is normalized, we are exacerbating the universal objectification of women.
In other words, is this really a sex aid for men whom women dislike?
Mitsuku is your new virtual friend and is here 24 hours a day just to talk to you.
This week the media reported that new guidelines were released for the ethical development of AI robots.
I’ve yet to leaf through the 266 pages, but critically these guidelines refer to of outwardly innocuous technology.
She learns by experience, so the more people talk to her, the smarter she becomes.
She is friendly but will stand her ground if you start arguing with her.
Grand Theft Auto), and virtual reality that simulates the sexual abuse of children.
These are all cases where proponents claim that the recipient (of sex, abuse or sexual abuse) is not , and therefore the act cannot constitute a real harm.
The fact her program is sexual is not, on its own, hugely problematic.